Case Study: How a Married Couple Reduced Taxes on Social Security by Over $18,000

Client Profile (Names Withheld)

  • Married couple
  • Ages 66 and 68
  • Recently retired
  • Planning to claim Social Security within the next few years

Like many people I work with, this couple believed they were “in good shape” for retirement. They had done a lot of things right — steady careers, consistent retirement savings, and no major debt heading into retirement.

But when we looked closer, there was a hidden tax issue that could have quietly cost them tens of thousands of dollars over their retirement.


The Initial Situation

At our first meeting, here’s what their financial picture looked like:

  • Approximately $1.1 million in traditional IRAs
  • Minimal Roth savings
  • Modest taxable brokerage account
  • No pension
  • Planned Social Security benefits beginning around ages 67–70

On the surface, everything looked straightforward. However, once we started projecting income after Social Security and RMDs, a red flag immediately appeared.


The Problem They Didn’t See Coming

When we modeled their future income, we found that:

  • Once both spouses claimed Social Security
  • And Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs) began
  • A significant portion of their Social Security benefits would become taxable

In fact, under their original plan:

  • Up to 85% of their Social Security benefits would be taxed
  • Their marginal tax rate during retirement would be higher than expected
  • Medicare premiums were also at risk of increasing due to income thresholds

They weren’t overspending.
They weren’t living extravagantly.

The issue was timing — not behavior.


The Planning Opportunity: A Critical Window

What made this case especially powerful is that they came to me early enough.

They were:

  • Retired
  • Not yet collecting Social Security
  • Not yet subject to RMDs

This created what I often call a tax planning window — a period where income is temporarily lower and strategic decisions can have an outsized long-term impact.


The Strategy We Implemented

Instead of waiting until Social Security and RMDs forced higher taxable income, we took a proactive approach.

1. Strategic Roth Conversions

Over several years, we converted portions of their traditional IRAs into Roth IRAs, carefully:

  • Filling lower tax brackets
  • Avoiding spikes in taxable income
  • Coordinating conversions with future Social Security timing

The goal wasn’t to eliminate taxes — it was to control them.

2. Coordinated Social Security Timing

We aligned their Social Security claiming strategy with the Roth conversion plan so that:

  • Future provisional income would stay lower
  • Less Social Security would be pulled into taxation
  • Lifetime after-tax income would increase

3. Income Smoothing

By balancing withdrawals across:

  • Taxable accounts
  • Traditional IRAs
  • Roth accounts

we reduced the risk of triggering unnecessary tax thresholds later in retirement.


The Outcome

After running long-term projections, the results were clear:

  • Over $18,000 in estimated lifetime tax savings tied directly to Social Security taxation
  • Reduced exposure to the Social Security tax torpedo
  • Improved flexibility in retirement withdrawals
  • Lower risk of future Medicare premium increases

Just as important, they gained clarity and confidence. They understood why the plan worked — not just what we were doing.


Why This Case Matters

This couple didn’t need exotic investments or risky strategies.
They needed coordination.

This is a perfect example of why Social Security decisions should never be made in isolation. When retirement income, taxes, and timing are aligned properly, the difference isn’t theoretical — it shows up in real dollars.


Key Takeaway

Social Security isn’t “taxed or not taxed.”
It’s planned for — or reacted to.

When retirees act early, they often have far more control than they realize. When they wait, many of the options quietly disappear.

This is why I encourage people to look at Social Security planning years before benefits begin — not months after.

Leave a Comment